On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 2:08 PM, 神明達哉 <[email protected]> wrote: > At Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:57:05 -0400, > Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What do other think here -- do we want to decide on the discovery and >> binding problem first, or do we think that we should choose a document >> and start working on that (and possibly add in discovery / binding >> later)? >> >> <no-hats> >> I'd personally like to start working on a document - i think it helps >> focus us in something concrete, and will move the discussion from an >> abstract type thing to actually getting work done... >> </no-hats> > > I support this approach.
Excellent. I have seen more support for this than for the "partitioning the problem up" proposal, and so we will be starting CfAs tomorrow. Please remember to read the documents! W > Given that we are already behind the > schedule and there will be quite likely more delays (as usual in the > IETF in general), I think it's more practical and productive to start > working on concrete proposals with keeping in mind > abstract/architectural points than spending even more time on these > issues first. > > -- > JINMEI, Tatuya -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
