Having heard nothing back, I'm going to have to assume that both of these documents are absolutely completely 100% perfect, and could not be made any better, clearer or more complete...
I find this, um, surprising... I'd love to be able to publish these two documents, declare success and shut this WG down... but I'm assuming that the WG simply hasn't finished reviewing these, so, pretty please, review and provide feedback... W On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Please review our documents: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dns-over-tls/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls/ > > We would like to see a significant amount of review and discussion before > our meeting in Yokohama - if not it is hard to justify the meeting time. > > I put in the request for early port allocation few days back... > > W > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in > the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of > pants. > ---maf -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
