Hi Jan-- On Wed 2017-04-26 11:05:33 +0200, Jan Včelák wrote: > thank you for writing this down. The draft is great. And it's awesome > that it's accompanied with an actual running code.
thanks! and thanks for the quick review :) > A have just a few notes after reading the draft for the first time: > - For the sake of simplicity, I would suggest dropping the part about > HTTP/0.9. I don't think it's worth the effort keeping it supported. That would definitely make the document much simpler :) I suppose i should float this by the HTTP community, to see whether they agree that it's ok to drop HTTP/0.9. > - The Section 3 (Overview of initial octets) is a little bit chaotic > and scattered. Maybe it would be more readable if you just provided > pointers to specification of the protocols without providing much > details, then shown the initial octets (or headers) side by side > without analysing the content, and in the end walked by the bytes from > the beginning while discussing the values. I understand what you're saying, i'm not sure how to do this exactly. With DNS, the fields are fixed size and have fixed meaning, but with HTTP, there's an abstract grammar. So they don't just "line up" side by side, as it were. I can certainly remove the copied text and just leave pointers to other documents, but that seems like it effectively asks the reader to do a bunch of pointer chasing when i've already done the pointer-chasing for them. Any concrete suggestions for how to improve it? It's maintained in markdown at https://gitlab.com/dkg/hddemux and i welcome merge requests or patches! > - I love how simple the algorithm is in the end. And the proof is > great. I'm glad you like it too -- i'm happy that it seems possible to be strictly confident in the demuxing. --dkg
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
