> On Apr 28, 2017, at 9:23 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> That also implies that this service cannot be defined as valid for any >> service that isn't already assigned. That would effectively be squatting >> on the entire port space. > > I don't think i understand what you're saying here. The document is > about how a server can distinguish between existing versions of DNS and > existing versions of HTTP. it's not making any claims about any other > service. are you suggesting that it is making such a claim?
I'm saying that the statement that it works now is just that. It can't be a standard. It can't be a bcp. I don't see how it can be a WG doc outside of HTTPbis. IMO it falls under the "hazard to the Internet" part where it might not even qualify as a valid individual submission. Joe _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
