On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:44:19PM -0700, Joe Touch wrote: > > The key, however, is that this proposal is really redefining HTTP ports > 80 and 443 (if that's the direction you go), and you need to get > consensus on that. It's not enough to simply say "we want to do it and > it works as currently specd".
The properties this draft exploits for detection are completely fundamential to HTTP/1.x and HTTP/2. There is no way anything that breaks those properties can be deployed on mass scale without a new ALPN, which should be ample warning to the server that new things are going on. This isn't "unextendable because of middleboxes", it is "unextendable because the endpoints can't negotiate". -Ilari _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
