Also If you feel the chairs are missing some aspect of this, please speak up and let's make sure those are covered.
thanks Tim On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote: > All, > The chairs would like to get the WG discussion started on exploring > privacy solutions for recursive resolver to/from authoritative server > exchanges. To start, we want to focus on *use cases and requirements*. > In our view, the WG needs to consider the: > > - User perspective > - Implementer perspective > - 2nd-level server operator perspective > - Recursive resolver operator perspective > > For the time being, we would like to bypass the TLD server operator > perspective. While we are in this phase of discussion, the chairs would > like everyone to follow these guidelines: > > - Focus on *what* is needed. > - Avoid *how* to achieve it. > - Consider both ends of DNS the exchange. > - Scenarios will frame the discussion. > > The chairs will start a mailing list thread for each of the four > discussion points. As ideas are presented, we will start aggregating the > details in a GitHub repo. > > Regards, > Brian & Tim > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
