On 19 Jul 2018, at 19:30, Tim Wicinski <tjw.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > For the time being, we would like to bypass the TLD server operator > perspective. While we are in this phase of discussion, the chairs would > like everyone to follow these guidelines: > > - Focus on *what* is needed.
This seems wrong to me. Sorry. If TLD operators are to be bypassed at this stage, how can the WG get a clear understanding of what's needed? I think operators of "important" auth servers have to be part of the discussion from the outset. If not, the WG may well come up with a solution that busy authoritative servers can't or won't deploy. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
