Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings again. A document on which I am a co-author refers to > draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis. As I was updating references in that > draft, I thought that maybe draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis was done. > However, according to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/, > this draft's state has be "AD followup" for many months now. > > Is there something that the draft authors or the DPRIVE WG need to do to > help move this forward?
Other recent submissions have changed their references to RFC 7626. What changes in the 7626-bis document are important to you? thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
