Hi Paul, On 9/17/20 10:36 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. A document on which I am a co-author refers to > draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis. As I was updating references in that draft, I > thought that maybe draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis was done. However, according > to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/, this > draft's state has be "AD followup" for many months now. >
After the IETF Last Call, there were some concerns raised by several people. As I mentioned earlier, the editor, chairs, and AD discussed those issues and potential resolutions. Several of the concerns raised revolved around changes made due to last call comments. The chairs and the AD determined that there was not consensus to make those changes, so part of the delay has been in determining what changes had consensus and backing out the other changes. We now believe we have a version which represents WG consensus and addresses consensus supported comments made during IETF last call. > Is there something that the draft authors or the DPRIVE WG need to do to help > move this forward? Another aspect of the delay was that the original draft authors have decided to step down as editors. I personally want to thank the authors, especially Sara, for pushing this document forward to this point. She should be commended for the diligence and effort she put forth. In order to keep the document moving, Tim has agreed to take up the editor's pen at this point. We should be publishing a new version today. I will remain as the responsible chair for the document. If anyone has any questions on the above, please get in touch with either me, Éric, or Tim. Regards, Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
