On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 5:20 AM Brian Haberman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Other recent submissions have changed their references to RFC 7626. What > > changes in the 7626-bis document are important to you? > > > > The changes made to the BCP document were driven by feedback from IESG > members who rightly pointed out that the BCP referred to text originally > found in 7626 and that 7626-bis was in a state of churn. > That makes sense to me. I was only pointing out that the same tradeoff might apply to Paul's document. I personally don't understand what 7626-bis adds, and it doesn't seem like completing the revision has been a pressing concern. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
