> Il 21/09/2020 08:20 Rob Sayre <[email protected]> ha scritto: > > > Paul Hoffman <[email protected] mailto:[email protected] > > wrote: > > > Greetings again. A document on which I am a co-author refers to > > draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis. As I was updating references in that > > draft, I thought that maybe draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis was done. > > However, according to > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-rfc7626-bis/, > > this draft's state has be "AD followup" for many months now. > > > > Is there something that the draft authors or the DPRIVE WG need to do to > > help move this forward? > > Other recent submissions have changed their references to RFC 7626. What > changes in the 7626-bis document are important to you? > To me, the question is different: the working group has put substantial effort into this document, for about two years. It even went to last call, receiving a single objection. I thought this meant that we had more or less reached rough consensus, but that single objection prompted several more months and several more revisions to address those objections and new objections that were added after those objections were solved. Ok, it's fine if we can make the document better, but at a certain point in time one would expect that the document gets finalized and published - there is always time to start working on further documents if needed. Instead, the document seems to be lost in a limbo forever. Honestly, this does not encourage people to commit their time and contribute.
-- Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange [email protected] mailto:[email protected] Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
