> On Mar 18, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 5:02 AM Tomas Krizek <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> I oppose adoption.
> 
> The draft introduces huge amount of additional complexity, both for
> implementors and operators of DoH. This raises the bar for both smaller
> vendors and operators, thus leading to more centralization.
> 
> This seems like an odd argument. We shouldn't do something that's
> a manifest increase in privacy (even as experimental!) because it's
> work to implement?

I would also point out that no one is asking that generic recursive resolvers 
implement this strategy, not only because it would be experimental. Certainly 
there would be no expectation that all DoH servers support this. Instead, cases 
where clients are particularly concerned about revealing client IP and identity 
to very large public resolvers benefit more from this. The intent of having an 
experimental RFC is to have a common way to achieve that goal.

Tommy
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Additionally, the problem it attempts to solve is not DoH-specific, or
> even DNS-specific, yet it only provides a solution for DoH.
> 
> On 17/03/2021 14.00, Brian Haberman wrote:
> > All,
> >      This starts a DPRIVE WG call for adoption for
> > draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh
> > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh/ 
> > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh/>).
> > Please reply to the mailing list with your views (positive or negative)
> > on the WG adopting the document and your supporting arguments.
> > 
> >      This call will end on March 31, 2021 at 11:59pm UTC.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Brian & Tim
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > dns-privacy mailing list
> > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy 
> > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Tomas Krizek
> PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495  C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy 
> <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy>
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to