> On 18 Mar 2021, at 16:21, Eric Orth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I disagree with your assumption that clients/users are only concerned about > particular resolvers.
Eric, I didn’t make any assumptions about that at all. It was Tommy who said ODNS would benefit those who were concerned about leakage to very large public resolvers. All I did was suggest a simpler alternative that wouldn’t need an RFC or the introduction of more complexity and lots more moving parts. If the aim of ODNS is to prevent leakage to resolvers *in general*, then that’s a different story. But as I said the use case and problem statement isn’t (yet) compelling enough. The cost/benefit analysis is unclear too. YMMV. _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
