I support adoption. I think that this work is useful, and I would like to see it happen in DPRIVE.
David On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:45 AM Christopher Wood <[email protected]> wrote: > As an author, I support adoption of this draft as experimental, with the > understanding that the WG will control ownership. (Indeed, we *want* input > from the folks in this WG to improve the protocol!) > > Best, > Chris > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, at 6:00 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > > All, > > This starts a DPRIVE WG call for adoption for > > draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh > > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pauly-dprive-oblivious-doh/). > > Please reply to the mailing list with your views (positive or negative) > > on the WG adopting the document and your supporting arguments. > > > > This call will end on March 31, 2021 at 11:59pm UTC. > > > > Regards, > > Brian & Tim > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dns-privacy mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy > > > > _______________________________________________ > dns-privacy mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy >
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
