On 3/31/21 9:23 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 02:12:03PM +0100, > Jim Reid <j...@rfc1035.com> wrote > a message of 15 lines which said: > >> But the WG doesn’t seem to want to consider that. > > But what DPRIVE could do here? RFC 8806 is published. Besides sending > its successor on the standards track, what do you suggest the group to > do?
That would be a first step. Does anyone have an idea of how widely used 8806 is today? We would also need to determine the best way to advertise 8806, or its successor, as part of the overall DNS privacy solution. Brian
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list dns-privacy@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
