> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2021 12:18 PM > To: Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [dns-privacy] [Ext] WG strategy on opportunistic vs > authenticated moving forward > > On Jul 13, 2021, at 8:56 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott > <[email protected]> wrote: > > If a solution can be developed that works for all levels of the DNS > > hierarchy, > fine > > Are you saying that the current WG draft, draft-ietf-dprive-unauth-to- > authoritative-03, doesn't work at all levels of the DNS hierarchy? If so, the > specifics of that would be important for the WG to work on.
No, I'm responding to Tim's request for input: "We feel like the WG will not be able to make additional progress on any of the proposed solutions until we can reach consensus on whether the solution should be homogeneous from the root down or that the real focus is on SLDs and down." SLD isn't quite right given that there are second-level domains that act like top-level domains, so I tried to be more precise by using "delegation-centric" instead. The service discovery part of any draft that requires publication of records in the parent could be an issue (as Tim noted), but beyond that I'm not specifically commenting on either of the proposed solution drafts. Scott _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
