On Jul 13, 2021, at 8:08 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> wrote: > . . .my preference would be for the WG to focus on solutions for > authoritative name servers serving zones that aren’t delegation-centric.
This has come up before, and I'm trying to figure out why. If this WG comes up with a protocol that any zone operator can choose to implement, why differentiate between delegation-centric and anything else? It feels short-sighted to look at current zone contents and try to optimize a solution for them, instead of just making all DNS extensions optional. --Paul Hoffman
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
