> And these folks tend to win operational/engineering arguments, > otherwise we'd still be running: > > RIP, NCP, BGPv1, BGPv2, BGPv3, > Sometimes, you've got to cut the cord. hint: the above protocols can still be run and not get damaged by boy engineers who seem to like to argue.
- Re: IPv6 dns Mark . Andrews
- Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: IPv6 dns Bruce A. Mah
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: IPv6 dns Havard Eidnes
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Marc Blanchet
