> regarding the new root servers which respond to queries over IPv6 - > one thing you didn't quite mention, but I suspect is necessary, is > that their IPv6 addresses be stable. that is, that once root > servers are established at these addresses and are advertised, > that there will continue to be authoritative root servers at > those addresses for the forseeable future. > > this has implications for the roots; but perhaps also, for their > ISPs and for address assignment in general. regardless of what > assumptions we make about IPv6 renumbering elsewhere, we don't > want to renumber the root servers very often. and i thought y'all were talking about an *experiment*. randy
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: IPv6 dns Havard Eidnes
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Marc Blanchet
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Cricket Liu
