Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > this has implications for the roots; but perhaps also, for their > > ISPs and for address assignment in general. regardless of what > > assumptions we make about IPv6 renumbering elsewhere, we don't > > want to renumber the root servers very often. > > and i thought y'all were talking about an *experiment*. I believe I've said about five or six times that I, at least, am not talking about an experiment. I'm talking about *deployment*. I can't speak for other people, but from my point of view, IPv6 is no longer "experimental". Perry -- Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Quality NetBSD CDs, Support & Service. http://www.wasabisystems.com/
- Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
- Re: IPv6 dns Havard Eidnes
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Marc Blanchet
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Cricket Liu
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
