% It has occurred to me for some time that we should be willing to % supply host routes for the root servers in the default free % zone. We're only talking about a tiny number of servers, and it is the % only service for which this is necessary. Yes, it would end up adding % a dozen extra routes to the tables, but I think that in general it is % probably the right way to go. % % Anyone else have thoughts on that notion? % % Perry % THe last time it was seriously raised was at the Joint IETF/ISOC mtg in Montreal. The failure modes are pretty spectactular, at least until DNSsec is deployed and applications can verify the accuracy of the data received from a root server. -- --bill
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Randy Bush
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Marc Blanchet
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Keith Moore
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Bill Manning
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Cricket Liu
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Havard Eidnes
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
- Re: IPv6 dns Havard Eidnes
- Re: (ngtrans) Re: IPv6 dns Matt Crawford
- Re: IPv6 dns Perry E. Metzger
