Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Shane Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Remember that registries are concerned with address to name mapping, and
| this is a name to address mapping - one that is already performed
| elsewhere.
This has nothing to do with anything. Anyone delegating pieces of the
DNS tree (whether for profit, as a public service, or just to other parts
of their own organisation) ought to be doing it properly. And that
includes inserting glue records whenever they are required.
But ...
| IIRC, I asked for community input about this issue when I was at ARIN,
| and received no feedback - my guess is that the Internet at large
| doesn't consider it an important issue.
this doesn't surprise me at all.
kre
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mans Nilsson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... Mark . Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about... James Raftery
