% Then (taking into account the RIR's previous experience with glue records
% and the resounding lack of people caring about the reverse tree etc), what
% would be the 'best' way of doing this?
DataPoint:
for 1q2001
Brittle data indicates ~60% of the in-addr.arpa tree is not mappable.
Mice&Men data indicates ~75% of the forward tree is not mappable.
Which tree is more broken?
--
--bill
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Mats Dufberg
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cathy Murphy
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Mark . Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
