If there is a serious proposal of some merit for the wider community based
on the RIR hosting boxen and doing things with them, I am keen to narrow
down the spec, and get it proposed. There are opportunities for coordination
face to face in August (IETF) and before then on email.
Secondly, if there is some refinement of procedure for glue requirements
which can be defined and then equalized across the RIR and if appropriate
NIR/LIR, lets get that done too.
Cheers
-George
--
George Michaelson | APNIC
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PO Box 2131 Milton QLD 4064
Phone: +61 7 3367 0490 | Australia
Fax: +61 7 3367 0482 | http://www.apnic.net
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Mark . Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Peter Koch
