> There is also the issue of educating administrators on this methodology,
> which isn't the way that most forward delegation is carried out (e.g.
> one of nominum.com's name servers is ns-ext.vix.com, which doesn't fit
> in the "use only name servers in the domain to respond authoritatively
> for that domain" model.
As a model for good DNS delegation it is overkill.
A just as robust model is "a nameserver should be a official
(not stealth) server for the zone it lives in". ns-ext.vix.com
fits this model as it is a server for vix.com.
This leads to NS chains of length 1.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... bert hubert
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... Bill Manning
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... George Michaelson
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... Bruce Campbell
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... Mark . Andrews
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... James Raftery
- Re: Should a nameserver know a... D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Robert Elz
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Shane Kerr
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Cricket Liu
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Jim Reid
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itse... Peter Koch
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Kenneth Porter
- Re: Should a nameserver know about itself? Olaf Kolkman
