At Fri, 07 Nov 2003 06:46:19 +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote: > > > Your friendly neighborhood WG chairs have been watching the ongoing > > discussion and trying to see whether we determine the will of the > > working group in this matter. > > Watching? I think you have been actively acting for DHCPv6-Lite.
Nolo contendre, but the two are not mutually exclusive, since the question was about what the WG believes, not about what I believe. > Can you agree that your attack on well known address approach > on failure mode is unfounded and applicable to all the > approaches? I still think there's a difference in the default query propegation behavior for a badly configured network, if that's what you're asking. Whether that's relevant to anything the WG cares about is for the WG to decide. > As I saw no response from you to my counter arguement, I thought > you are convinced that well know address approach is good enough. I had nothing new to say on the subject. #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
