On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:20:21 +0900, Ohta san wrote: > >>1. a "stateless" subset of the current DHCPv6, as specified in > >> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateless-01.txt > >>2. an extension to the current DHCPv6 that has the ability to > >> multicast the stateless information (that I guess Alain first > >> proposed) > > > >> (i). In what way is DHCPv6-lite insufficient? > > > > DHCPv6-lite has no way to inform a DNS recursing server renumbering. > > That is a good reason to use well known addresses not affected by > renumbering.
So we've used 'Well known "site-local" unicast addresses' in our ADSL service since the summer of 2002, but traditional site-local unicast address is expected to be deprecated soon... -- SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro @ NTT Communications t: +81-3-6800-3262, f: +81-3-5365-2990 #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
