Hi, I have read your draft, draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00.
The question was raised just now in the dnsop working group meeting in Vancouver as to whether the content of this draft was suitable for adoption as a working group item. The question was triggered by the presence of "dnsop" in the draft name.
I have read your document. I do not believe it is a suitable basis for a dnsop working group item. Specifically:
1. The document describes a namespace which is substantially different form what is available in the DNS today. The existing DNS namespace is not addressed at all.
2. The document seems to address an extension to (or an application for) the protocol described in draft-licanhuang-dnsop-distributeddns, which (to this reader) seems clearly not to be "the DNS", at least any conventional meaning of that term.
Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
