Mohsen Souissi wrote:
I have read the I-D as well and I second Joe's point of view and his arguments
below.
+1.
Brian
Mohsen.
On 03 Dec, Joe Abley wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have read your draft, draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00.
|
| The question was raised just now in the dnsop working group meeting in
| Vancouver as to whether the content of this draft was suitable for
| adoption as a working group item. The question was triggered by the
| presence of "dnsop" in the draft name.
|
| I have read your document. I do not believe it is a suitable basis for
| a dnsop working group item. Specifically:
|
| 1. The document describes a namespace which is substantially different
| form what is available in the DNS today. The existing DNS namespace is
| not addressed at all.
|
| 2. The document seems to address an extension to (or an application
| for) the protocol described in draft-licanhuang-dnsop-distributeddns,
| which (to this reader) seems clearly not to be "the DNS", at least any
| conventional meaning of that term.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
