On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, George Michaelson wrote:
I would support this latter approach William: I think we should seek WG
adoption of three drafts
1) the michaelson as112-ipv6 draft, aiming for at least one 01 spin to a small
set of non-controversial V6 delegations, moving to WGLC and IANA asap.
2) your as112-ipv4-cull draft, but shorn of the operational aspects, likewise
rapid movement to WGLC and IANA
For the consideration of members of DNSOP to adopt as a working group
item, -01 of my draft has been submitted.
3) an AS112 operational draft more in the nature of 6304/5/bis
This one will follow a little later, I suspect more expanded than before.
I would like to ask for WG adoption of AS112-IPv6 on that basis.
+1, especially since some as112 natives are getting restless.
Thanks,
wfms
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
