On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:11:41PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:08 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, George Michaelson wrote:
> >
> >> I would support this latter approach William: I think we should seek WG
> >> adoption of three drafts
> >>
> >> 1) the michaelson as112-ipv6 draft, aiming for at least one 01 spin to a
> >> small set of non-controversial V6 delegations, moving to WGLC and IANA
> >> asap.
> >>
> >> 2) your as112-ipv4-cull draft, but shorn of the operational aspects,
> >> likewise rapid movement to WGLC and IANA
> >
> > For the consideration of members of DNSOP to adopt as a working group item,
> > -01 of my draft has been submitted.
> >
> >> 3) an AS112 operational draft more in the nature of 6304/5/bis
> >
> > This one will follow a little later, I suspect more expanded than before.
> >
> >> I would like to ask for WG adoption of AS112-IPv6 on that basis.
> >
> > +1, especially since some as112 natives are getting restless.
> >
>
> I made a suggestion at the mic in the f2f meeting, and then on the as112
> operators list -- there seems to be some support for it there, so I'm now
> doing it onlistb &
>
> How about simply making AS112 omniscient (know the answers for *all* space)?
> As decisions to have AS112 answer / not answer for zones get made,
> delegations can simply be added and removed.
>
> Obviously this would require synthesizing answers[0], and these servers
> cannot be used for answering recursive queries (and a few other minor issues)
> but this will (as far as I can see) solve the lameness / coordination
> issues...
>
>
> W
>
> [0]: Yes, yes i *did* feel dirty writing thatb &.
>
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > wfms
> > _______________________________________________
> > DNSOP mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
>
been there, done that. before ICANN existed, I ran the RFC 1918 auth
servers.
put in a wild card TXT "Please read RFC 1918" to any/every query.
20min later
after the university pres had fielded calls fm industry about being
hacked- we removed
the wildcard... until leaking DNS queris fm private netsinto the
Internetcan
be stopped, you can't reliably anwer the queries.
/bill
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
