On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:08 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, George Michaelson wrote: > >> I would support this latter approach William: I think we should seek WG >> adoption of three drafts >> >> 1) the michaelson as112-ipv6 draft, aiming for at least one 01 spin to a >> small set of non-controversial V6 delegations, moving to WGLC and IANA asap. >> >> 2) your as112-ipv4-cull draft, but shorn of the operational aspects, >> likewise rapid movement to WGLC and IANA > > For the consideration of members of DNSOP to adopt as a working group item, > -01 of my draft has been submitted. > >> 3) an AS112 operational draft more in the nature of 6304/5/bis > > This one will follow a little later, I suspect more expanded than before. > >> I would like to ask for WG adoption of AS112-IPv6 on that basis. > > +1, especially since some as112 natives are getting restless. >
I made a suggestion at the mic in the f2f meeting, and then on the as112 operators list -- there seems to be some support for it there, so I'm now doing it onlist… How about simply making AS112 omniscient (know the answers for *all* space)? As decisions to have AS112 answer / not answer for zones get made, delegations can simply be added and removed. Obviously this would require synthesizing answers[0], and these servers cannot be used for answering recursive queries (and a few other minor issues) but this will (as far as I can see) solve the lameness / coordination issues... W [0]: Yes, yes i *did* feel dirty writing that…. > Thanks, > > wfms > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
