On Jul 10 2012, Paul Wouters wrote:
At Quebec City I volunteered for a use cases document for automating
parent-child DNS updates. I've submitted a draft for it, and hope to
get feedback before and in Vancouver...
Paul
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wouters-dnsop-secure-update-use-cases/
| 3.2. The NS RRset
|
| Both the child and the parent have a copy of the NS RRset. These
| RRsets are supposed to be identical. If they differ, it is referred
| as a "Lame Delegation".
I have always thought that a "Lame Delegation" was something more specific:
an NS record in the delegation that points to a server that is not in fact
authoritative for the zone at all. Is the above actually common usage?
[That's not to say that any differences between the two NS RRsets is ever
desirable, except as may be necessary or expedient during a change.]
--
Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service,
Email: [email protected] New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QH,
Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
