Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Jim Reid wrote: > > > So it may be better if the draft uses a different term for the scenario > > where > > the parent and child do not have the same NS RRset. Perhaps that can be > > called a Broken Delegation? Because that's what it is.... > > I've changed it from lame delegation to broken delegation.
I suggest simply dropping the sentence 'If they differ, it is referred as a "Lame Delegation"' instead. I don't think Jim's suggestion of "broken delegation" is common usage for the particular situation of "parent and child NS RRsets differ" any more than "lame delegation" is, and as far as I know, there is no established shorthand term that refers specifically to this situation. -- Andreas Gustafsson, [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
