On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:16:21PM +0300, Andreas Gustafsson wrote: > > I've changed it from lame delegation to broken delegation. > > I suggest simply dropping the sentence 'If they differ, it is > referred as a "Lame Delegation"' instead. I don't think Jim's
while this discussion is refreshing, the reason Paul (was) volunteered to write this document was less the (re-)definition of the lame delegation terminology but more to address (potential) requirements for an in-band child parent key exchange. Let's leave the bikeshed black for the moment and focus on the design of the bikes instead. -Peter _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
