I had sent a more detailed off-list reply, but I should address this: On Mar 1, 2013, at 7:02, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote:
> Thus before we go into discussion into details of record formats, lets > have the REPLACE vs ADD/DELETE discussion. My starting assumption is that the CDS will be a tool used inside a script or procedure (which may already exist in operating zones) that performs the change of the SEP. These tools vary by operator because of the myriad of combinations of requirements in place. In my opinion, for the CDS to be useful in all of the various environments if has to avoid getting beyond the most basic primitives. No assumption that the adds and deletes are parts of a replace, no expression of timing, no expression of any other policy-like thing. Leave the semantics to the scripts and policies already in place. Even if you just do that, CDS cuts down on having to transport the keying material via something like cut and paste from a dig or web page to a web form. (To use the situation I have most in mind.) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 There are no answers - just tradeoffs, decisions, and responses.
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
