On Jul 3, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Warren Kumari <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jul 2, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Matthijs Mekking <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This sounds a lot like prefetch in unbound, and the configuration option >> gives some analysis on increased traffic. >> prefetch: <yes or no> >> If yes, message cache elements are prefetched before they expire >> to keep the cache up to date. Default is no. Turning it on >> gives about 10 percent more traffic and load on the machine, but >> popular items do not expire from the cache. > > Doh, sorry, I was not aware that Unbound did this. I'd like to recognize this > in the draft, any idea who actually suggested it / added it to the code? My question earlier still stands: does Unbound do what HAMMER says (waits for a request before refreshing the cache) or does it just refresh the cache automatically? The Unbound doc is unclear (at least to me). --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
