Doug,
The draft is not in any way limited to the TLD and one level down it is
supposed to be a generic solution.
I think it would be great for the root zone as by using CDS/CDNSKEY all
requests are publicly visible and can be verified
by any interested party.
Olafur
On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:33 PM, Doug Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 10/08/2013 01:22 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> In many regulatory environments (the polite way of saying where ICANN
>> says "No!")
>
> Just FYI, it's not ICANN that says no. It's the registrars who do not want
> ANY channel of communication with their customers that does not go through
> them. ICANN simply provides a context around which to solidify the agreed
> upon relationships contractually.
>
>> the *registrar* will fetch the CDS / CDNSKEY and will
>> push the updated records into the *registry* through existing
>> mechanisms (like EPP).
>
> Right, so instead of convincing hundreds of registries you're going to
> convince thousands of registrars? And you've had exactly how much interest
> from them?
>
> Doug
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
