On Oct 8, 2013, at 11:48 AM, Doug Barton <[email protected]> wrote:
> However I think a reasonable conclusion from the stalemates that have arisen > from all of the previous attempts over the years would be, "There is no > agreement on how to proceed, so we should not proceed." That is the opposite of the feeling that I got from the DNSOP meeting in Berlin. > But have we any evidence that if created, this mechanism will be used? IIRC, there were at least a few TLD operators at the DNSOP WG in Berlin who indicated they would strongly consider it. > I personally don't subscribe to the "If we build it, they will come" school > of engineering. We have too many counterexamples in the DNS already. That's fine; neither you or I (currently) run a TLD and we don't have to think about it yet. This is for the people do run TLDs, and the multitude who are going to be doing so soon. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
