On Oct 8, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Alan Clegg <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2013, at 6:18 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Doug, >> >> The draft is not in any way limited to the TLD and one level down it is >> supposed to be a generic solution. >> I think it would be great for the root zone as by using CDS/CDNSKEY all >> requests are publicly visible and can be verified >> by any interested party. > > And as the administrator of a number of zones with hundreds of delegations, I > want this for my own internal use. > > Not TLD related.
Excellent. And does the current draft solve your use case? Do you like the current CDS / CDNSKEY split? What would make the current draft better? (AKA, looking for reviews / feedback). W > > AlanC > -- > Alan Clegg | +1-919-355-8851 | [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- She'd even given herself a middle initial - X - which stood for "someone who has a cool and exciting middle name". -- (Terry Pratchett, Maskerade)
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
