In message <cakr6gn3fsneterut_mmtwbzoeppjoi-efbiejcp9ug6n7f9...@mail.gmail.com>
, George Michaelson writes:
>
> in OID space, It was my experience that Russ ran the registry pretty
> open-minded. Its a classic dewey-decimal growing numberfield, so the cost
> burden of carving out a new OID is low, and he was minded to ask basic
> questions, steer you, but in the end, assign a unique value for the wider
> public benefit.
>
> is there a quality to the RR registry that it HAS TO HAVE a high barrier to
> entry? I've never tried proposing a new RR. I don't understand if, compared
> to OID, it has a higher compliance, consequence, risk-side..
What high barrier to entry? Fill out a form and you get it basically
provided you meet the minimal criteria. You can choose a experimental
type to test code with while you are waiting to the value to be assigned.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6895
> -G
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
