In message <[email protected]>, "Mark Delany" writes: > On 17May14, Mark Andrews allegedly wrote: > > > > domain ENAME domain {0|1} [type list of included / excluded types] > > (0 == include, 1 == exclude) > > As I recall, the HTTP/2.0 folks have been intermittently talking about > supporting SRV. Would encouraging that group on that front be easier > than inventing CNAME support at the apex? > > No reason to think either approach would get better or less > adoption-rates over time. > > Or are there other uses for ENAME beyond what the HTTP/CDN crowd do > with CNAMEs today?
I would encourage both. ENAME is just service agnostic. > Mark. > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
