On 17 maj 2014, at 13:51, Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > It might be worth actively pushing the CDN folks to go the SRV direction. > Even if ENAME were a good idea, which is not clear to me, it's an idea that > would require significant infrastructure changes, whereas SRV records appear > to be functional now, with no DNS software changes.
As I have stated several times I disagree with any statement that claim "significant infrastructure changes". This usage is the reason I did define the URI resource record, so that one could get a "redirect" already in DNS instead of escaping to HTTP. example.com. IN URI 1 2 "https://foo.hosting.bar/example.com/startpage/en"; Patrik _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
