>>> It might be worth actively pushing the CDN folks to go the SRV direction. >>> Even if ENAME were a good idea, which is >not clear to me, it's an idea that would require significant infrastructure >changes, whereas SRV records appear to be >functional now, with no DNS software changes.
As I understand it, this is proposing a large DNS change as an alternative to a modest HTTP change. Doesn't strike me as a great tradeoff. R's, John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
