On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 08:22:22AM +0100, Måns Nilsson wrote: > > ...we still very much would like STD80 charset in the canonical file.
Anything in STD80? That's kinda strange. The STD13 "rule" is effectively the Preferred Syntax, which is LDH. Alternatively, labels are octets. Note that there are most definitely systems that put UTF-8 in zones, and this is entirely fine and legitimate; it just doesn't work that well on the Internet maximally construed. > Non-ASCII characters then probably should be encoded using IDNA. Perhaps here you mean, "labels should be IDNA-conformant"? If so, underscore labels are out, and that seems like it'd suck. A -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
