On Feb 22, 2015, at 8:09 AM, Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:22:47AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> >> Proposal: comments not be allowed in the canonical format. This will allow >> more likely interoperability. > > Ick. Also, the comment character is specified in RFC 1035. If you're > not doing that specification correctly, I suggest, you're not > implementing DNS.
Fair point. I was responding to Måns calling the format "canonicalized", which is not what Ed called for. If we just want a standardized form, we can leave comments in. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
