On 26/10/2015 09:52, I wrote:
> That's clear - what isn't perhaps, is what the RCODE should be, given > that this text is in a section with "Name Error" in its title. For what it's worth, I expect the answer to be NOERROR, but I think the text that lumps empty-non-terminals in with "name error" causes sufficient ambiguity and confusion that an errata may be in order. Ray _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
