On Monday, October 26, 2015 10:15:37 AM Ray Bellis wrote: > On 26/10/2015 09:52, I wrote: > > That's clear - what isn't perhaps, is what the RCODE should be, given > > that this text is in a section with "Name Error" in its title. > > For what it's worth, I expect the answer to be NOERROR, but I think the > text that lumps empty-non-terminals in with "name error" causes > sufficient ambiguity and confusion that an errata may be in order.
strong +1. names that don't exist can't have children. -- P Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
