On 28 Jun 2016, at 16:54, Ted Lemon wrote:
Unfortunately the updates to adpkja do not address the serious
problems in
the document that led to me writing a replacement.
Could you list those? In Buenos Aires, the major problem was "lack of
focus" and "organization", and it feels like both of those have been
well addressed in the past few drafts since the meeting.
Warren and I are working
on an update to the tldr document.
Good, but should that prevent the WG from adopting
draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem? If so, why?
--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
