I’ve updated draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem to include the two missing points raised yesterday by Paul. The new draft is available at: https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem-05.txt
Alain > On Jun 28, 2016, at 5:27 PM, Alain Durand <[email protected]> wrote: > > Paul, > > >> On Jun 28, 2016, at 5:00 PM, Paul Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The other document that this WG has considered, draft-tldr-sutld-ps, has not >> been updated to be less wordy and less historical. Having said that, there >> are a few bits from Section 4 of that document that I think should be added >> to Section 4 of draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem, namely the >> "warranted allocation" problem and the "experimental squatting" problem. I >> would like to see those added in the more-terse style of >> draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem. > > Thank you for your comments and for pointing out those two specific missing > elements in draft-adpkja-dnsop-special-names-problem. > I will take a pass at summarizing thosee two points and post an updated draft.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
